🔗 Share this article

The true crime category has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and structure: police body cam footage. Countenances of those harmed, witnesses and possible perpetrators appear suddenly to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of headlights or flashlights as the officers approach, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or fear or anger or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often incidentally glimpse the faces of the officers themselves, one standing by blankly while the other conducts the inquiry with what occasionally seems like extraordinary diffidence – though maybe this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

A Growing Trend in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the streaming service real-life crime film The Gabby Petito Case, about the slaying of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose main point of interest was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of Ajike Owens in a city in Florida, a African American woman whose children reportedly bothered and tormented her neighbor, a local resident. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were summoned multiple times, the accused shot Owens dead through her locked door, when Owens went to Lorincz’s house to confront her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and Legal Context

The arresting officers found evidence that Lorincz had done online research into the state's self-defense statutes, which permit residents and others to shoot if there is a significant presumption of danger. The movie builds its story with the body cam footage generated during the multiple officer calls to the scene before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic incident site itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of the caller calling the police in a melodramatically shaky voice. There is also police cell footage of the individual which has a chilly, queasy fascination.

Portrayal of the Accused

The film does not really suggest anything too complicated about the neighbor, or any mitigating factors. She is clearly unstable, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an ugly jibe. The film is showcased as an example of how self-defense regulations lead to senseless and tragic bloodshed. But the reality of firearm possession and the second amendment (that historic American constitutional privilege that a late commentator famously claimed made gun deaths a price worth paying) is not much emphasized.

Police Interrogation and Gun Culture

It is feasible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel surprised at how minimal concern the officers took in this aspect. When did she buy her gun? Did she receive any instruction on handling it? Was this the first time she discharged the weapon? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The police aren’t shown asking any of these undoubtedly important questions (though they could have inquired in footage that didn’t make the edit). Or is possessing a firearm so normal it would be like asking about microwaves or bread heaters?

Detention and Consequences

For what seemed to her neighbors a very long time, the suspect was not even arrested and charged, only held and even provided accommodation away from home for the night (another parallel, by the way, with the a prior incident). And when she was ultimately formally arrested in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply refuses to stand, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not hostilely, but with the courteously pathetic demeanor of someone whose psychological state means that she is unable to comply. Did the gentle handling up until that point encouraged her to think that this might actually work?

Conclusion and Verdict

It was not successful; and the panel's decision is revealed in the closing credits. A deeply sobering portrayal of American crime and punishment.