🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

Latvia's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to protect women from abuse, including family violence, following prolonged and heated debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the decision. The final authority now rests with President the nation's president, who must determine whether to endorse or veto the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to establish laws and support services to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to begin the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a decision that human rights organizations characterized as a major regression for women's rights.

Ideological Controversy and Resistance

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative factions have argued that its emphasis on equal rights undermines traditional families and promotes what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Saeima, MPs decided 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action proposed by opposition parties but supported by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for centre-right government leader the nation's PM, who joined protesters outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the primary parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose head has called on citizens to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official appealed for the treaty not to be made political, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it was an instrument to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked widespread protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

22,000 people have signed a Latvian petition calling for the treaty to be preserved. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging MPs of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Concerns and Possible Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly commented that Latvia had made a rash choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and deeply concerning regression for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in the continent".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for further consideration if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, instead of ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in our nation but throughout Europe," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of gender-based violence
• Latvia's decision could affect comparable debates in additional EU countries